A Profound Concept from President Clinton’s Speech

Wednesday night President Clinton made a profound statement.  It wasn’t the point he was trying to make – he was trying to show what a great economy it was he governed over and how many jobs he had created.  The statement was that during his presidency many people moved off welfare and into work.

The interesting observation is that when people who had been on welfare most of their adult lives were forced to find jobs, the economy did better.  It may just be coincidence, but I wonder.

Let’s say that there are two of us in the world.  We each need food and shelter.  If you grow enough food for you to eat and build your shelter, and I grow enough food for me to eat and build my shelter, we’re fine.  If you’re better at building shelters and I’m better at growing food, I can grow extra food for you while you build my shelter, and we’re still fine.

If I decide to do nothing, however, leaving you to grow food and make shelters for us both, neither one of us will be as well off.  Our shelters will be weaker and the amount of food we will have will be less.

Even if food is taken from you and given to me, such that I can “pay” you for building my shelter with the food that was taken from you and given to me, there is still less “stuff” in the world.  It does no good for me to be able to trade food for the shelter if the food was yours to begin with.  We’re just moving goods around – nothing of value if being created.  You might also decide that there is no reason to continue growing extra food and grow just enough for you.

Currently we have a lot of people out of work who are being paid without needing to create anything of value.  This means that there is less value being created, meaning that there is less for everyone.

Maybe if instead of giving out unemployment checks, governments connected unemployed people with open jobs and/or had them do temporary jobs that were needed in exchange for pay, everyone would be better off.  Maybe unemployed engineers could be given the job of designing a new bridge that is needed.  Unemployed construction workers could then build that bridge.  Unemployed accountants could track the expenses and prepare the payroll.  Unemployeed administrative staff could create the project proposal,

These should not pay as well as private sector jobs, to encourage people to continue to look for jobs rather than just do government jobs forever, but it would both provide needed income during periods when people needed help and at the same time be creating something of value for the money.  You’re spending the money anyway – why not get something needed out of it?

One trillion dollars after the stimulus, we don’t see much change.  It is the hope that trying something else will work.

Please contact me via vtsioriginal@yahoo.com or leave a comment.

Follow me on Twitter to get news about new posts: @SmallIvy_SI

Disclaimer: This blog is not meant to give financial planning or tax advice.  It gives general information on investment strategy, picking stocks, and generally managing money to build wealth. It is not a solicitation to buy or sell stocks or any security. Financial planning advice should be sought from a certified financial planner, which the author is not. Tax advice should be sought from a CPA.  All investments involve risk and the reader as urged to consider risks carefully and seek the advice of experts if needed before investing.


  1. I found out today that over 49% of American’s receive some sort of government assistance to pay their bills. That number is way out of hand! Talk about big government.

    • Yes, government welfare has grown dramatically over the last several years. It has gone from something only the very poor would receive to something people well into the middle class receive. I believe it is all about power. If you take away $1.00 from someone, you can give them ninety cents back in providing a service they used to do for themselves, keeping a dime for administration of the program. The bigger the program, the more money you can siphon off as administrative expenses, which then gives you a bigger budget to build nicer offices and create other perks. Also, by taking from and then giving back to someone their own money, you can then require they do certain things to get their money back. The odd thing is that once a benefit is established, people will fight tooth and nail to keep it, even though they could get it cheaper if they provided for themselves and they wouldn’t need to jump through hoops to do so.

      • I agree and think the government is just buying votes. What “poor” person is going to vote against a government that says they are going to take money from the rich and give it to them in the form of a check every month.

        I put “poor” in brackets because I think half the people receiving benefits probably have an iPhone, flat screen TV and enjoy Starbucks 3 times a day.

Comments appreciated! What are your thoughts? Questions?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.